Companies often overlook important nuances as they try to segment their customers
Segmentation strategy is a hot topic, especially in the supply chain. For many companies the focus is to isolate a handful of key customers and then lump all of the rest together.
It’s a bit like a naïve Pareto analysis.
For example, many CPG companies will segment Target, Wal-Mart, Other. Durable goods companies might segment Home Depot, Lowes, Other. In general we find segmentation encompasses just three (maybe a couple more) buckets and that is it. How are they making this decision and what are they using it for?
The isolation of these customers is partially based on volume and partly based on governance. For example, a big box retailer is more likely to measure performance AND have the ability to enforce that performance in the form of penalties and preferences. They can exert power and manufacturers know this.
What is the special treatment the ‘A’ customers receive? How is the segmentation used? For the most part these customers receive a higher focus on fill rate adherence and increased priority during times of allocation. This, in fact, is not segmentation nor is it strategy. Instead this is more akin to a traditional expediting program. This approach works because the goal (to keep the customer happy) is met based on priority.
You may ask then, why did I call this a naïve Pareto view of customer segmentation?
This approach is missing a way to identify and take advantage of opportunity with both the ‘A’ customers as well as the ‘Others’. It is one thing to meet a goal; it is another to identify how a relationship can provide further benefit to your organization. You never know, there may be the next Wal-Mart or Target hiding in the ‘Other’ pile. And, keep in mind that volume ranking doesn’t always equate to the highest margin or profitability.
How do you change your segmentation to put some weight on the emerging stars? How do you add in some analysis that is forward looking? And then, what can you do to capture this market?
I will explain with a personal story.
I had a run in with United Airlines a few months ago and the customer service offered to me was lacking—what felt like United’s lowest level of service available. Why? I have not flown United much in the last 5 years, I am not one of their important frequent flyers—the cash cows. These fliers receive the ‘A’ service.
I would propose that I might merit a higher level of service if they took a moment to segment on opportunity. I fly 75k+ business miles a year. Those are high-margin business miles. Surely it should be easy to find my travel profile and figure out that I am a potentially profitable customer. Heck, they could look in their own data base and see that I had more than 500K miles on their airline at one point.
But they didn’t. They are segmenting their customers purely on recent volume which misses a lot of opportunity.
Let me circle this back to the initial point. Today’s idea of segmentation misses several opportunities. One of these is that there is likely a second level of customers who have strong volumes and margins and yet are placed in the ‘Other’ pile.
My advice: Take the segmentation exercise to your next tier of customers. I have a strong feeling you will release significant incremental value from this exercise.
If all we are doing is using customer segmentation to prioritize allocation we are missing out on potential value. We should look at how to tailor a specific, profitable supply chain response to both ‘A’ and ‘B’ customers.
This is where you will start ‘thrilling’ customers with your ability to serve their specific needs. This is where you will start to see margin impact through cost savings and fill rate improvements.
The naïve Pareto is missing an opportunity to pull more profit from your supply chain. Segmentation has been a popular supply chain topic recently but there is still a big gap between theory and practice.
Chris Russell is a vice president with Logility. You can reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
In my role with Logility, I have the opportunity to work with a wide variety of companies and executive management teams around achieving their supply chain goals and prioritizing their initiatives.
I recently sat down with MID Retail co-founders Mike Ruhana and Chuck Miller to discuss the qualities that lead to retail supply chain success. Drawing on their experience with more than 100 leading retailers, they have identified five habits for retail planning and allocation success that are, in their words, “true difference makers.”
We are at Gartner's 2014 Executive Supply Chain Conference this week and the opening keynote just wrapped up. Noha Tohamy, research vice president, and Debra Hofman, research vice president, discussed where the supply chain is headed by taking a retrospective look at where we have been.
It’s exciting when you see a company that “talks the talk” and “walks the walk” with complete conviction. Bill Nienburg, Vice President of Global Merchandising and Sales Planning, Under Armour, did just this in front of 300 supply chain practitioners at the recent Logility Connections 2014 conference in Atlanta, GA, calling the athletic apparel maker’s supply chain “a cornerstone for [Under Armour’s] overall growth agenda.”
Supply Chain Insights is hosting a survey that explores how supply and demand planning software implementation time impacts ROI. Take the survey and Supply Chain Insights will email you the final report at no charge--and you can receive a personalized review of the results by phone with Supply Chain Insights Founder and CEO Lora Cecere.
Cloud. Mobile. On Demand. Analytics Everywhere.
These were just a few of the themes discussed at this year’s Connections 2014, Logility’s customer conference. Held at the Loews Atlanta, the conference brought together several hundred of the industry’s brightest supply chain professionals to share their opinions, techniques and experiences.
When the mist clears can we see a picture of S&OP?
Last week, with several feet of snow out my window, I had some fun trying to visualize sales and operations planning (S&OP). I came up with this word cloud.
A word cloud is a graphical representation of the occurrence of words on a web site or in a document. The more prevalent the word is in a document the more prominent it displays in the graphic. Some people see little value in these graphics but I believe there is some insight to gain.
Gates, triggers and uncertainty envelopes. One of the greatest areas of opportunity for companies maturing their sales and operations planning (S&OP) processes is in New Product Innovation. Why?
Demand management has always been at the top of supply chain professionals’ list of challenges. Of late, many companies have also indicated that having grappled with cost cutting a few years back, now they are more focused on growth. Predictably, 62% of the respondents sought growth through channels, 46% through more direct customers, and approximately 20% by creating new products.